In Trump Marina Associates v. NLRB (October 14, 2011), the D.C. Circuit upheld the Board's decision that the employer committed unfair labor practices in a hotly contested election that the Union lost by a narrow margin. Among the actions that the Board held to constitute a ULP was a supervisory comment that the employer would not negotiate with the union and supervisory 'speculation' about layoffs or other matters as the result of unionization that were not based on objective fact.
Visit our Website
- Previant, Goldberg, & Uelmen, S.C.
The Homepage for Previant, Goldberg, & Uelmen, S.C.
News Releases from the NLRB
« Interrogation of Union Supporters Violates Act | Main | Ohio Votes to Protect Public Sector Collective Bargaining Rights »
October 31, 2011
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553624bb48834015392ab52b8970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supervisory "Speculation" About Layoffs Constitutes Unfair Labor Practice:
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- Judge Rules that New NLRB Election Rules are Invalid
- Judge Refuses to Stay Earlier Act 10 Decision, Except for Decertified Bargaining Units
- New State Law Protects Employers Who Discriminate Against Their Workers
- Can “Staying Fit” Result in a Compensable Work Injury?
- Court Upholds NLRB Notice Posting Requirement
- Judge Enjoins Wisconsin Act 10 Provisions Regarding Annual Recertification and Dues Deductions
- The Fate of the Health Care Law – or is it a Health Insurance Law? (Day Three)
- The Fate of the Health Care Law – or is it a Health Insurance Law? (Day One and Two)
- Supreme Court Rules that State Employees Cannot Sue their Employer for FMLA Violations
- It Violates the NLRA to Exclude Union Agent from Employer’s Premises After Hitting Him With Car
Categories
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
- Car Accidents and Personal Injury
- Discrimination Law
- Drug/Alcohol Testing
- Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA)
- Employment Law
- Family and Medical Leave (FMLA)
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
- Health Care Law
- Labor Law
- Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act
- Motor Carrier Regulations
- National Labor Relations Board
- Office of Labor Managment Standards
- Pension and Welfare Benefits
- Previant Legal Show
- Railway Labor Act (RLA)
- Social Security Disability
- Veterans' Reemployment Rights (USERRA)
- Voters' Rights
- Wages and Overtime (FLSA)
- Wisconsin Act 10
- Wisconsin Law
- Workers' Compensation
Comments